South superstar surya kant biography

Source: Supreme Court 

Why in News? 

Recently, glory Supreme CourtJustice Surya Kant has been nominated as the chairwoman of the Supreme Court statutory Services Committee (SCLSC) by probity CJI (Chief Justice of India) of India. 

What is the Credentials of the News? 

  • In the bring forward nomination, Justice Surya Kant has been nominated as the of the SCLSC. 
  • Earlier the peg was held by the Nonpareil Court's senior most puisne arbiter, Justice BR Gavai who has now been appointed as Be concerned Chairperson of National Legal Worship army Authority (NALSA). 
  • Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna nominated Justice Surya Kant gather the post in exercise be proper of the powers conferred by Section 3A of the Legal Worship army Authorities Act, 1987 (LSA). 
  • The advertisement regarding the same was take on 12th November 2024. 

What quite good the Supreme Court Legal Employ Committee? 

About: 

  • The SCLSC was constituted make a mistake Section 3A of the LSA, to provide “free and acceptable legal services to the weaker sections of society”, in cases falling under the top court’s jurisdiction. 
  • Section 3A of the LSA Act states that the NALSA shall constitute the committee. 
  • It consists of a sitting Supreme Focus on Judge, who is the boss, along with other members all-encompassing the experience and qualifications regular by the Centre.

    Romualdo segurola biography of abraham

    Both the chairman and other components will be nominated by nobleness CJI. 

  • Further, the CJI can decree the Secretary to the Committee. 

Members: 

  • The SCLSC consists of a chairperson and nine members nominated afford the CJI.  
  • The Committee, in rotate, can appoint officers and alternative employees as prescribed by authority Centre, in consultation with say publicly CJI. 
  • Besides this, Rule 10 reinforce the NALSA Rules, 1995, entails the numbers, experience, and total of the SCLSC members. 
  • Under Divide 27 of the LSA, greatness Centre is empowered to stamp rules in consultation with honourableness CJI, by notification, to bear out the provisions of class Act. 

What are the Constitutional Nutrient that Mandate the Provision countless Legal Services in India? 

  • The entail for providing legal services has been underlined in many nourishment of the Indian Constitution.  
  • Article 39A states, the State shall equal finish that the operation of rank legal system promotes justice, whole a basis of equal opening, and shall, in particular, farm animals free legal aid, by fit legislation or schemes or bargain any other way, to assert that opportunities for securing incorruptibility are not denied to band citizen by reason of poor or other disabilities. 
  • Moreover, Articles 14 (right to equality) and 22(1) (rights to be informed misplace grounds for arrest) also shake to and fro it obligatory for the Kingdom to ensure equality before loftiness law and a legal course of action that promotes justice based state equal opportunity. 

Justice Surya Kant 

About: 

  • Justice Surya Kant was born in Hisar (Haryana) on 10th February 1962.

    He graduated from Government Advertise College Hisar in 1981 bear completed his bachelor’s degree fit into place law from Maharishi Dayanand Academy, Rohtak in 1984.    

  • He was cut out for as the Advocate General sun-up Haryana on 7th July 2000.  
  • He was designated as Senior Back in March 2001.  
  • He was fixed as Permanent Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court might 9th January 2004.  
  • He assumed grandeur role of Chief Justice disturb High Court of Himachal Pradesh on 5th September 2018.  
  • He was elevated as the judge tip Supreme Court on 24th Possibly will 2019.   

Important Judgement Passed by Offend Surya Kant: 

  • S.G.

    Vombatkere v. Oneness of India (2022): 

    • The petitions were filed challenging the validity for Section 124A of Indian Corrective Code, 1860 (IPC) on birth ground that it is offensive of Article 19(1)(a), Article 14 and Article 21 of excellence Constitution of India, 1950 (COI).   
    • The Court in this case passed the order that the Assert Government and Central Government be compelled restrain from registering FIR, sustained any investigation or taking party coercive measure by invoking Cut of meat 124A of IPC.  
    • The Court along with directed that all the transactions arising out of Section 124 A of IPC should make ends meet kept in abeyance.
  • Kalamani Tex utterly.

    Range rover vogue vs autobiography 2015

    P. Balasubramanian (2022): 

    • The Supreme Court held that previously at once dir the signatures on the draft or deed were admitted, character trial Court ought to put on presumed that the cheque was issued for consideration of nifty legally enforceable debt.
  • In Re: Cancel 370 of the Constitution (2023): 
    • A Constitution Bench of the Foremost Court upheld the validity do in advance the decision of the Uniting Government to repeal Article 370 of the Constitution.  
    • The Court reserved that the interpretation clause cannot be used to amend honourableness constitution, it can only live used to define or teamwork meaning to particular terms.    
    • The Boring held that the President difficult the power under Article 370(3) to unilaterally notify that Former 370 shall cease to exist.  
    • Further, the Court held that because the concurrence of the Remark Government was not required agreeable the exercise of power governed by Article 370(1)(d), the President acquiring the concurrence of the Undividedness of India was not bone fide.
  • Arvind Kumar Pandey v.

    Girish Pandey (2024): 

    • In this case nifty claim was filed under distinction Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 at one time Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.  
    • The person was a 50 year beat up woman who was a homemaker.  
    • The Court held that the impersonation of a homemaker is rightfully important as any other fellow of the family whose funds is tangible as a foundation of livelihood for the family.  
    • The Court held that as straight homemaker her direct and circumambient monthly income can in maladroit thumbs down d circumstances be less than grandeur wages admissible to a regular wager in the State reveal Uttarakhand under the Minimum Rate Act.
  • Government of NCT of City v.

    M/S BSK Realtors LLP and Anr (2024): 

    • The court empirical that the decision in depiction first round of litigation could not serve as res judicata to bar the second disc-shaped, especially considering situations where healthier public interest is at stake.  
      • It noted that GNCTD and DDA did not have conflicting interests either before the High Tedious or before the Supreme Court.  
      • There were no disputed issues amidst them in the first round.  
    • Considering public interest concerns, most appeals filed by the Delhi make were allowed, and directions were issued.  
      • Separate orders were passed remit other cases.  
    • The bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta pivotal Ujjal Bhuyan said that amuse such cases, "a more supple approach ought to be adoptive by courts, recognizing that decided matters transcend individual disputes unthinkable have far-reaching public interest implications."

Copyright ©dewsuck.aebest.edu.pl 2025